| Shams Tomb & The Research Center of Shams & Rumi |
|---|
| Year: 2012 |
| Area: / |
| Type: Cultural |
| Status: / |
| Team: Mojtaba Davari Majd and cooperation |
| Introduction Shams Tabrizi- as one of the Gnostics dissent the subjective conventions looking for demonstrating spiritual concepts and real thralldom substance- is known by characteristic particulars such as kind aggressor and meta-ethical qualities. Meeting of Shams Tabrizi and MolanaJalaleddin was an introduction to emergence of an antithesis from the thesis itself. Synthesis of the phenomenon resulted in an ontology and new ideology (pantheist) for Gnostics. The meeting led to deconcentration of Molana's ideology or changing of his mental pattern. It resulted in development of mental flow in mysticism. Plan idea Meeting of Shams and Molana, their deep mental relationship, influence of Shams on Molana resulted in his mental variations, and necessity of clarifying their relationship at architectural body based on symbolic criteria was regarded as ideology fundamentals. Planning process The plan process was consisted of three sectors including before, during, and after meeting of Shams Tabrizi and Molana. Influence of Shams Tabrizi on Molana is the basis of the planning process. Every event changes gradually. The mental revolution requires conditions to de facto potential and capability of its potential concepts. Site substructure and plan idea serve as a catalyst for the dialectic process. At the beginning of the site, one moves inside of soil and another toward peak. Mind and love dialectic is seen at motion direction, material, and pathway dualistic. Here, ambiguity of pathway dualistic is felt. The phenomenon is rest on the site substructure where every motion raises from the site itself and energies found in the site changing potentials of the conditions to de facto. Here, the mentioned spaces and tomb are located inside the soil. It manifests hormonitic of material and meaning indicating that every phenomenon returns to its substance. Before meeting, Molana's characteristic and thought had subjective conventions and his thought was relied on subjective principles and conventions.To demonstrate this subjective issue and the process covered by a meaning to reach the form, cubic symbol was used as a sign of material world and conventions. The characteristic is disciplined as a cube and the meeting resulted in developing of a series of thoughts and mental movements. Wave and motion at the entry moves toward cube form affecting rigid body, changing its pattern, and surrounding the cube. It refers to encounter and interwoven nature of material and meaning and develops light and non-existence synthesis. Voiding the cube, the cube converted after the event, changes to a converter, i.e. the resulted cube indicates to connecting point of heaven and land. This symbolic contact recounts ambiguous event of the meeting. Uncertainty sense of Molana's thought to reach Sufism and mental stability was manifested in his characteristic. For this purpose, the cube was put on water to demonstrate the float sense in its peer material. The peak motion was in layer and gradual form toward plan center indicating to gradual characteristic variations. The way ends to amphitheater and west of tomb. Crosswise eight-wing Islamic designs respectively indicating to sun and four directions and omnipresent are seen at eastern part of the tomb and its roof. The plan background indicates to randomness of the meeting as the content in this classic space background forming tradition crust and occurring of connectivity and relationship of these two forms as an ambiguous and questioning one. To clarify every subject, its root and background should be considered and its reciprocity should be demonstrated. This multi-semantic feature has been demonstrated in this motion as well as changing concepts to forms. The most important objective is to manifest a character not in a direct way; rather, in a way symbolically associating the person and meeting. Generally, valuing a contextual phenomenon in the form and space framework will be meaningful based on the partner viewpoint. Neither this is nor that is. Either this is or that is. It aggravates the partner paraphrase. Plan idea and structure constitutes the tomb architecture far from any decorations indicating to Shams' simple life. |
